Oxford pupil who led ‘woke’ transfer to take away Queen’s portrait is American
The Oxford College pupil who led a vote to take away Queen Elizabeth II’s portrait — sparking outrage within the best tiers of UK govt — is a rich American non-public faculty boy who’s a Captain The us fan, it emerged Wednesday.
Stanford grad Matthew Katzman, 25, tabled the movement to take away the picture from Magdalen’s Heart Not unusual Room, pronouncing it used to be now not welcoming since the monarch “represents recent colonial history.”
Participants of the Heart Not unusual Room then voted in want via a “substantial” majority — sparking fierce backlash.
The Queen “is the head of state and a symbol of what is best about the UK,” UK Schooling Secretary Gavin Williamson tweeted. “During her long reign, she has worked tirelessly to promote British values of tolerance, inclusivity & respect around the world.”
A spokesman for Boris Johnson then advised the Day-to-day Mail that the top minister “supports” his minister’s remark.
Now it has emerged that the person main the motion to take down the portrait used to be now not even British, however from Washington, DC — simplest including to the outage.
Oxford College scholars voted to take away a portrait of the Queen from their not unusual room.Hulton Archive/Getty Pictures
Katzman is the son of business legal professional Scott Katzman, 65, who lives in a DC mansion price greater than $5.5 million, in step with the Mail.
He prior to now attended the $48,000-a-year Sidwell Buddies Faculty, a ancient Quaker non-public school — the place the Mail says he “likely” counted former President Barack Obama’s 22-year-old daughter Malia as a modern.
Her more youthful sister, Sasha, additionally went there, as did Nancy Reagan, Chelsea Clinton, President Biden’s grandchildren and the offspring of different presidents, together with Theodore Roosevelt and Richard Nixon.
His general training has price a minimum of $640,000, in step with the Mail.
Katzman could also be noticed in footage on social media with a Captain The us defend, along the Stars and Stripes.
However the pc sciences pupil insisted to the opening that eliminating the portrait didn’t “equate to a statement on the Queen.”
“The royal family is on display in many areas of the college, and it was ultimately agreed that it was an unnecessary addition to the common room,” he mentioned.
“It was decided that the room should be a welcoming, neutral place for all members regardless of background, demographic, or views,” he mentioned.
Matthew Katzman mentioned that “The royal family is on display in many areas” at Magdalen Faculty.Chris Ratcliffe/Bloomberg by the use of Getty Pictures“No stance was taken on the Queen or the royal family — the conclusion was simply that there were better places for this print to be hung,” he mentioned.
Magdalen Faculty — which has distanced itself from the vote — had lengthy been “solidly royalist,” with its well-known alumni together with King Edward VIII, and the Queen herself getting an honorary stage in 1948.
The monarch additionally visited in 2008 to mark its 550th anniversary.
The vice chancellor of the College of Oxford mentioned he hopes the verdict to take away the portrait “does not do too much damage” to the varsity’s recognition.Carl Court docket/Getty ImagesMagdalen Faculty’s president, Dinah Rose, wired on-line that the scholars “don’t represent the College,” whilst stressing that it “strongly supports free speech and political debate.”
“The photo will be safely stored,” she mentioned.
Lord Chris Patten, the vice chancellor of the College of Oxford, mentioned he hopes the scandal “does not do too much damage to the reputation of the college.”
“Freedom of speech allows even intelligent people to be offensive and obnoxiously ignorant,” he mentioned, in step with the Mail.
However Sir John Hayes, chairman of a Not unusual Sense Staff of MPs, mentioned the ones “involved should be thoroughly ashamed of themselves.”