Judge Merrick Garland, President Biden’s lawyer common nominee, repeatedly averted offering direct solutions to questions from Republican senators throughout Monday’s listening to earlier than the Senate Judiciary Committee. Garland dodged questions on the Durham investigation into the Trump-Russia probe origins, transgender athletes in highschool sports activities and whether or not crossing the border illegally needs to be a felony offense. Sen. Josh Hawley, R-MO, requested Garland whether or not he belives that illegally crossing the border ought to stay against the law.”I have not considered that query, I simply have not considered that query” Garland stated. “The president has made clear that we’re a nation with borders, with nationwide safety, I do not know of a proposal to decriminalize however nonetheless make it illegal to reply, I simply have not considered it.” Garland equally declined to make a agency commital to leaving Special Counsel John Durham in place to proceed his investigation into the origins of the Trump-Russia probe. Garland stated he has “no motive” to suppose that leaving Durham in place to proceed his investigation was the improper choice, however declined to decide to a plan of action. GARLAND ANSWER ABOUT CUOMO INVESTIGATION ‘NOT GOOD ENOUGH’: REP. STEFANIKSen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., pushed Garland to say whether or not or not Durham’s investigation is reliable, prompting the nominee to say: “I do not know actually something in regards to the investigation.” “I do suppose that any person ought to take a look at what occurred with respect to these FISAs and I imagine the inspector common has carried out that,” Garland added. Garland was additionally requested about permitting biologically male athletes who determine as transgender to compete in feminine athletic competitions. Sen. John Kennedy, R-LA, requested Garland if he agrees with the assertion that “Allowing organic males to compete in an all-female sport deprives ladies of the chance to take part totally and pretty in sports activities and is basically unfair to feminine athletes.”Garland declined to instantly reply Kennedy’s query instantly. “This is a really tough societal query that you just’re asking me right here, I do know what underlies it,” Garland started his reply.”I do know, however you are going to be lawyer common,” Kennedy shot again. “Well, however I is probably not the one who has to make coverage selections like that, not that I’m adversarial to it. Look, I believe each human being needs to be handled with dignity and respect. And that is an overriding sense of my very own character, however an overriding sense of what the regulation requires,” Garland answered. CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP”The explicit query of how Title IX applies in faculties is one which, in mild of the Bostock case, which I do know you are very accustomed to, is one thing that I must take a look at when i’ve an opportunity to try this. I’ve not had the prospect to contemplate these form of points in my profession to this point, however I agree that it is a tough query,” Garland answered. President Biden signed an govt order his first day in workplace that known as on faculties to permit transgender athletes to compete on women sports activities groups.